<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are You Thinking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/</link>
	<description>A Generalist in a World of Specialists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schaefersblog.com/?p=216#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>@ Andy,

You are right!  Being wrong keeps us humble, helping us realize that there is much to learn and it makes us think differently.  Being wrong also helps us cross things of the list making life more manageable.

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andy,</p>
<p>You are right!  Being wrong keeps us humble, helping us realize that there is much to learn and it makes us think differently.  Being wrong also helps us cross things of the list making life more manageable.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Drish</title>
		<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Drish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schaefersblog.com/?p=216#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>One of the highlights of &quot;thinking&quot;  is finding out when you are wrong.  Because admitting that you&#039;re wrong forces you to consider different perspectives... which makes you stretch.

Interesting post.  Let me know what you think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the highlights of &#8220;thinking&#8221;  is finding out when you are wrong.  Because admitting that you&#8217;re wrong forces you to consider different perspectives&#8230; which makes you stretch.</p>
<p>Interesting post.  Let me know what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Embry</title>
		<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-3407</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Embry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schaefersblog.com/?p=216#comment-3407</guid>
		<description>A contrast in thought universes: Edward de Bono (http://tinyurl.com/6hud7r) vs.  Peter Drucker (http://tinyurl.com/63kwng)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A contrast in thought universes: Edward de Bono (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6hud7r" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6hud7r</a>) vs.  Peter Drucker (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/63kwng" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/63kwng</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akshay Kapur</title>
		<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>Akshay Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schaefersblog.com/?p=216#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>Cameron, 

This is a very deep and provocative post.  I&#039;ve been dwelling on the thinking process quite a bit especially since personally undergoing a very recent and still evolving transition into a new mode of thinking.  I have to credit books and blogs and my recent business projects for this, but what has been remarkable is the out-of-body perspective I&#039;ve had throughout the process.

Anyway, to delve more into the content of your post...technological enhancements in communication over the past two decades have had a huge impact on information gathering.  All of a sudden its possible to reference your thinking real-time.  Instead of a retrospective approach, we&#039;ll slowly graduate to a more prospective approach to data-driven thinking meant not to prove but to pave the way for new avenues of thought.

Tim Ferriss has a few posts on Josh Waitzin&#039;s book, The Art of Learning, which seems very reminiscent of de Bono&#039;s book.  Check it out if you haven&#039;t already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron, </p>
<p>This is a very deep and provocative post.  I&#8217;ve been dwelling on the thinking process quite a bit especially since personally undergoing a very recent and still evolving transition into a new mode of thinking.  I have to credit books and blogs and my recent business projects for this, but what has been remarkable is the out-of-body perspective I&#8217;ve had throughout the process.</p>
<p>Anyway, to delve more into the content of your post&#8230;technological enhancements in communication over the past two decades have had a huge impact on information gathering.  All of a sudden its possible to reference your thinking real-time.  Instead of a retrospective approach, we&#8217;ll slowly graduate to a more prospective approach to data-driven thinking meant not to prove but to pave the way for new avenues of thought.</p>
<p>Tim Ferriss has a few posts on Josh Waitzin&#8217;s book, The Art of Learning, which seems very reminiscent of de Bono&#8217;s book.  Check it out if you haven&#8217;t already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron C. de Weijze</title>
		<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron C. de Weijze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schaefersblog.com/?p=216#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>I believe the purpose of thinking is to know the environment we live in. If there is a mismatch, we are in serious trouble. When we think the door-handle is on the right while it actually is on the left, we get obstructed. That is how it is in general as well. It can lead to neuroses, such as being unrealistic or not being able to be personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the purpose of thinking is to know the environment we live in. If there is a mismatch, we are in serious trouble. When we think the door-handle is on the right while it actually is on the left, we get obstructed. That is how it is in general as well. It can lead to neuroses, such as being unrealistic or not being able to be personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Goodlin</title>
		<link>http://www.schaefersblog.com/why-are-you-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Goodlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schaefersblog.com/?p=216#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>I can totally relate.  I can think back to several times in the past week or so where I wanted to be right and those were the thoughts I focused on.  We are wired to be selfish, resulting in our thought life to be self-focused.  How can we use our thinking abilities for the better good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can totally relate.  I can think back to several times in the past week or so where I wanted to be right and those were the thoughts I focused on.  We are wired to be selfish, resulting in our thought life to be self-focused.  How can we use our thinking abilities for the better good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.406 seconds -->

